Explore the key differences between LiteSpeed and Apache: performance, caching, security, and resource usage — to help you choose the right server for your WordPress website.
Compare NowIn a large file transfer test with 50 concurrent users, LiteSpeed delivered ~129 MB/sec vs Apache’s ~103 MB/sec—with ~18% lower latency. LiteSpeed matched Nginx (≈ 129 MB/sec). :contentReference[oaicite:6]{index=6}
Under WordPress HTTP/2 tests, LiteSpeed handled up to 69,600 requests/sec, compared to Apache’s 826 req/sec—a performance difference of up to 84×. :contentReference[oaicite:7]{index=7}
For most WordPress sites—especially high‑traffic or performance-focused ones—**LiteSpeed with LSCache** offers faster speeds, stronger caching, and better resource efficiency than Apache. For basic, low‑traffic sites or those on minimal budget, **Apache** remains a reliable and flexible choice.
Q: Is LiteSpeed always faster than Apache?
A: Yes, benchmarks show LiteSpeed handles significantly more requests per second and lower latency compared to Apache in both static and WordPress tests. :contentReference[oaicite:8]{index=8}
Q: Does Apache still support WordPress well?
A: Absolutely—it’s widely used and supports .htaccess, PHP‑FPM caching, and is very stable.
Q: Can I migrate from Apache to LiteSpeed easily?
A: Yes—LiteSpeed is drop‑in compatible with Apache configs, allowing seamless transition. :contentReference[oaicite:9]{index=9}